ARMATOXTE SOLUTION. THIRD PROBLEM OF UNDERSTANDING
http://www.mediafire.com/?ydgzyuzygmy (link to see results)
Dear Friends contestants CREATIVE - MIND. First competition inter-discursive understanding,
ship here TOX ARMA solution TE, the third problem of the battery of 11 scheduled. The contest is part of a megaestrategia designed to streamline processes, operations and psycholinguistic skills involved in processing verbal information.
welcome and appreciate the enthusiasm of the 2386 people, who from different geographic corners and from very different professions and knowledge, they sent us a solution. Beyond the hit or miss, it is important to know that the act of seeking the answer is intellectual gymnastics performed with determination, love and rigor, it makes us stronger, agile, accurate and problems less unhappy.
Our appreciation to all participants. The appointment is for Friday, April 9, 2010, the day we publish our fourth problem. Hugs
CASTRO JAIRO MORENO ANÍBAL
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Is It Safe To Use A Treadmill Upstairs
ARMATOXTE. THIRD PROBLEM OF UNDERSTANDING
INTERAGENCY COMPETITION
UNDERSTANDING CREATIVE MIND PROBLEM 3
In the next two pages you will find a text divided into A TITLE (appears disorganized) and 18 fragments. Such fragments are also presented in a disorganized manner. One of them, while talking about the same topic, does not belong to the text.
The problem has three tasks:
1. Arrange the title (consistent reassembly, without omitting or adding any word).
2. Organize the text, placing the fragments in the recommended order, without omitting or adding, or changing words)
3. Indicate which is the fragment that does not belong to the text.
OVERVIEW: The level of complexity of the problem is MEDIUM-BASIC, but is suitable for contestants with relational thinking (10 over), the contents are recommended for adult literacy (school graduates). It is built primarily to evaluate and promote: Analysis and synthesis. However, implies (peripherally other thought processes and language, basic meaning, relationship and inferential contextualization.
INTERAGENCY COMPETITION
UNDERSTANDING CREATIVE MIND PROBLEM 3
In the next two pages you will find a text divided into A TITLE (appears disorganized) and 18 fragments. Such fragments are also presented in a disorganized manner. One of them, while talking about the same topic, does not belong to the text.
The problem has three tasks:
1. Arrange the title (consistent reassembly, without omitting or adding any word).
2. Organize the text, placing the fragments in the recommended order, without omitting or adding, or changing words)
3. Indicate which is the fragment that does not belong to the text.
OVERVIEW: The level of complexity of the problem is MEDIUM-BASIC, but is suitable for contestants with relational thinking (10 over), the contents are recommended for adult literacy (school graduates). It is built primarily to evaluate and promote: Analysis and synthesis. However, implies (peripherally other thought processes and language, basic meaning, relationship and inferential contextualization.
and like that commits another mental game we both read,
1. At this moment, the game requires completing the text reader with new mazes. This is essential to the reader, calling criticism, supportive attitude.
2. bold and effective, they must perform with remarkable precision, acute sensitivity, three plays masterpieces: Track, find and produce:
3. And it is even. And it is precisely there and they who by location and profession should encourage, rather than sentencing him to the agony fatally.
4. The resulting game is completed, ie the text adding new puzzles, other puzzles. This requires a skill very generous.
5. This involves flying over the text, in-front-sele, face him in profile, details on its edges, break their structure, break and then recompose your unit.
6. Such activity, practiced for millennia and has its origins in cave hieroglyphic sign is a mental game also punished by schools and teachers.
7. Finally, tracking, finding and producing, reading protects us from despair, soft dictatorship and dictatorship (especially the dictatorship of the numbers).
8. This is how reading teaches us also there and perhaps for a long time, we soften the tedium, we hide the drowsiness, moderate us forever reluctance.
9. Also, she pulls us out of undeserved captivity, many repressed fantasies from school, we extradite to the future make us crafty visionaries.
10. Recently we say that writing is one of those games of human intelligence happier and more repressed while in life and in school.
11. Finally, at this point in the game, the player requires creative feeling to reinvent the text to recreate with their knowledge, judgments and prejudices.
12. Trace signals for clues, find ways to discover mysteries, to produce and generate shortcuts senses. Master moves underserved by us teachers.
13. The first maneuver is to search on a patient - for hidden or distant they are - every corner of the text, the strategy is to then, recognize their shapes, explore its nooks,
14. For its part, "find" the second play this delightful game master mental, has to do with filling gaps, associated signs, holes covered with meaningless content.
15. Today, in the same terms and with no less emotion, we will refer to another form of intellectual play and contact: the act of reading.
16. In this task memorable, this action in principle simple to fill forms pulposus muscle crude, could be called mean, discover meanings.
17. To begin it should be emphasized that in that game, which itself is exciting, great players, the fittest, most agile,
18. It depends on the contradictions, confusions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and inconsistencies text are finally in evidence.
1. At this moment, the game requires completing the text reader with new mazes. This is essential to the reader, calling criticism, supportive attitude.
2. bold and effective, they must perform with remarkable precision, acute sensitivity, three plays masterpieces: Track, find and produce:
3. And it is even. And it is precisely there and they who by location and profession should encourage, rather than sentencing him to the agony fatally.
4. The resulting game is completed, ie the text adding new puzzles, other puzzles. This requires a skill very generous.
5. This involves flying over the text, in-front-sele, face him in profile, details on its edges, break their structure, break and then recompose your unit.
6. Such activity, practiced for millennia and has its origins in cave hieroglyphic sign is a mental game also punished by schools and teachers.
7. Finally, tracking, finding and producing, reading protects us from despair, soft dictatorship and dictatorship (especially the dictatorship of the numbers).
8. This is how reading teaches us also there and perhaps for a long time, we soften the tedium, we hide the drowsiness, moderate us forever reluctance.
9. Also, she pulls us out of undeserved captivity, many repressed fantasies from school, we extradite to the future make us crafty visionaries.
10. Recently we say that writing is one of those games of human intelligence happier and more repressed while in life and in school.
11. Finally, at this point in the game, the player requires creative feeling to reinvent the text to recreate with their knowledge, judgments and prejudices.
12. Trace signals for clues, find ways to discover mysteries, to produce and generate shortcuts senses. Master moves underserved by us teachers.
13. The first maneuver is to search on a patient - for hidden or distant they are - every corner of the text, the strategy is to then, recognize their shapes, explore its nooks,
14. For its part, "find" the second play this delightful game master mental, has to do with filling gaps, associated signs, holes covered with meaningless content.
15. Today, in the same terms and with no less emotion, we will refer to another form of intellectual play and contact: the act of reading.
16. In this task memorable, this action in principle simple to fill forms pulposus muscle crude, could be called mean, discover meanings.
17. To begin it should be emphasized that in that game, which itself is exciting, great players, the fittest, most agile,
18. It depends on the contradictions, confusions, ambiguities, inconsistencies and inconsistencies text are finally in evidence.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Live! Central No Supported Webcam Connected
ARMATOXTE. THIRD PROBLEM OF UNDERSTANDING
SALUTE TO FRIENDS OF THE OTHER CONTESTANTS UNIVERSITIES AND FOREIGN COUNTRY THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST OF UNDERSTANDING "CREATIVE MIND" MADE BY AND CONTEXTS OF LEARNING SIGNUM ACEDÉMICOS ... THE LINK BELOW CONTAINING THE THIRD PROBLEM (FOR DOWNLOAD) CALL " ARMATOXTE." LES recall that the solution must be postmarked by TUESDAY, MARCH 30 UNTIL 11:50 PM TO E-MAIL signumaulaabierta@hotmail.com wish them luck ... EVEN IF YOU DO NOT CONTEST, YOU CAN START NOW, THE ITEMS ARE COMBINED.
http://www.mediafire.com/?nwzd3jdmwt5
SALUTE TO FRIENDS OF THE OTHER CONTESTANTS UNIVERSITIES AND FOREIGN COUNTRY THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE CONTEST OF UNDERSTANDING "CREATIVE MIND" MADE BY AND CONTEXTS OF LEARNING SIGNUM ACEDÉMICOS ... THE LINK BELOW CONTAINING THE THIRD PROBLEM (FOR DOWNLOAD) CALL " ARMATOXTE." LES recall that the solution must be postmarked by TUESDAY, MARCH 30 UNTIL 11:50 PM TO E-MAIL signumaulaabierta@hotmail.com wish them luck ... EVEN IF YOU DO NOT CONTEST, YOU CAN START NOW, THE ITEMS ARE COMBINED.
http://www.mediafire.com/?nwzd3jdmwt5
Mountandblade Come Dragonball
12. Let there be light!
Go saber
have given me this month with the electricity bill! I do not know what I've done this month I have been an exorbitant bill. But if the light should be free! With of sunlight during the day there should be an unlimited resource for us. In fact, the Sun generates about 300 times the energy needs of all humanity. In a second produces the equivalent of the energy released in 1000 million Go saber
the nuclear bombs of Hiroshima.
I do not want to imagine the time that the charge of turning the sun gets its energy bill. I would pay around 200 million euros each month to keep the sun on. And I'm complaining!
would surely be talking about it with your neighbors. For example, talking to the one in charge of starting the nearest star to the Sun, Proxima Centauri:
- 200 million euros! But if I do so that the land is
bathe on the beach and not to gustito goosebumps ...
- Go past! 200 million!
- Hey, What about you how much I have taken this month by turning Proxima Centauri?
- For around 30000 euros.
- Is that all?
- Yes, I turn on Proxima Centauri with light bulbs and only spending ten thousandth part of what you spend.
- Well if you do not spend so much! The other day I was talking to he that soweth Vega and spent 37 times more than me.
- Yes I mentioned this to that guy who has a robot named star, Cyg OB2-12. He told me to produce 6 million times more than you, so it must work selling land on the Moon to pay their electricity bill, because it did not pay me or breaking the piggy bank piggy my first communion.
Poor things ... There are ... Criticizing the neighborhood without knowing that the Universe are upscale neighborhoods that can afford to produce more energy than that. Supernovae emit 10000 million times more than the sun A plain little galaxy, 100000 million times and an active galaxy 100 million billion times the Sun
Do you see? I have already lost again with so many zeros. Who can tell me to figure out these numbers it deserves in the Guinness Book of Records as the person who can contain the entire universe in just the size of his skull. Less
zeros has the range of variation in the mass of a star. There are no stars with masses less than 7% of the mass of the Sun, because so little mass can not produce fusion reactions in its core (precondition to say he is a star). Nor can there be stars with masses larger than 100 times the solar energy it would produce so violently dismember the star. That's good! A star has between 7% and 100 times the mass of the Sun This I can not imagine.
But that's as stars are concerned. The black hole at the center of our galaxy is of the order of one million solar masses. And there are galaxies with billions of solar masses concentrated in the center of the supermassive black hole. Well
go! I'm not going to escape from both zero, or what?
I'll try again with temperatures of stars. The surface of the Sun is about 6000 degrees. But the coolest stars are about 350 degrees and the hottest temperature reached to about 80000 degrees on its surface. While that is the temperature surface. At the core of the Sun, there is a temperature of about 14 million degrees.
Bah! That's nothing. On Earth we have been able to record temperatures of about 100 million degrees . So for once we won the Sun
Although you do not become illusions. We won the Sun, but not to the stars. Some stars within it can be thousands of millions of degrees. So even in this win.
Anyway, it seems that if I deal with numbers that do not reach one million in the field of astronomy, the only alternative left for me is watching the current account of an astronomer. Well, at least mine. Maybe there's some high class astronomer working in parallel selling land on the Moon and has become wealthy enough to comfortably able to pay their electricity bill.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Mom In Nylon Stockings
11. Geography
to see where I'm going to run ... I have no idea where to go. I am open to suggestions. Luckily my GPS is one of those modern, brand Tun Tun , which even gives you suggestions of sites to visit (GPS is a button called "Navigate to Tun Tun ). Select this option and asked me how many miles I travel.
Today I feel a whole macho. Let's say I run about 10 km. See what I propose. Look, I said that if I run 10 km, all I have to do is run all the Avenida Diagonal in Barcelona from beginning to end.
I think I bought the GPS of the Junior Woodchucks , because it tells me that 10 km is the distance to the highest clouds in the atmosphere and that the planes are at 10-12 km altitude. How curious! The pileup that I bought is fine. I will explore some more.
How far will the Barcelona to Lleida? I said that about 150 km, the same as the height to which are the Northern Lights in the sky. Ho, ho. This GPS is the peel!
And from Barcelona to Valencia? About 350 km. As the altitude at which the ISS revolves around the Earth. Barcelona How to Pontevedra? The radius of Pluto. "From Barcelona to Warsaw? The radius of the planet Mercury. "From Barcelona to Athens? The radius of the planet Mars. "From Barcelona to Ottawa? The radius of the planet Venus. From Barcelona to Toronto, the radius of the Earth.
I understand now. I just found a GPS option called "Heaven to Tun Tun" which lets you navigate through the universe ... Says that the radius of Neptune and Uranus is like going to the antipodes of the Earth, the radius of Saturn is like a ride and half the world. And the radius of Jupiter, the largest planet in the Solar System, is a world tour and 3 / 4. (About 70000 km in radius). And the sun's radius is about twice the distance from Earth to the Moon. Wow!
Meter "Solar System on a football field? How? Anyway, I'll give OK to see what I get ... Go! It shows the distances of the planets from the Sun as if the Sun were in a goal in a soccer field and the (formerly) most distant planet (Pluto) was on the other end.
Well, I think that the ball must be in the area of \u200b\u200bthe Sun because almost all the planets are in your area. Surely they are launching a corner. Then the team take care of Pluto and not rely because it only have been in court to defend Uranus and Neptune. As has a counter ...
And the stars? What will? No, I do not mean the stars of the football match, which in this case would only be the Sun, but how are the other stars of the Galaxy to the Sun "The Sun is too big or too small?
Man, that the sun was two times the distance to the Moon has hit me, really. So the little sun should not be. In fact, the smallest known star has a size equal to one-eighth the size of the Sun, ie, only slightly larger than Jupiter.
But it is known star with a radius of about 2000 times larger than the Sun, or 700 billion times larger than a person like me 1.80m.
Do you think we killed the size of the stars? In our galaxy there are 100 billion stars. The galaxies are grouped in clusters of galaxies ... I guess you that I still say the size of galaxies and the universe and blah, blah, blah ... Well, I refuse! Perhaps you have not lost you yet with so much kilometer loose. But I am not able to imagine anything bigger. I leave here.
Ugh I think that today I'm not going to run. What sense does it run if run as much as I'm not going to see more of the universe, so I leave that for another day I've forgotten what little I am (even my belly no longer seems so huge).
Finally yesterday I started to run again, after several years contemplating the belly was enough to know that Saturn floats on the water more than me to decide. Leaving aside now all the muscles ache and I can not move unless it before I run (that is, to do sports I think it's bad for my physical, because I run my body is less useful if I do not run) I bought a GPS for running routes and not get lost in the mountains if someday I decide to run through the forest to avoid breathing the fumes of cars.
to see where I'm going to run ... I have no idea where to go. I am open to suggestions. Luckily my GPS is one of those modern, brand Tun Tun , which even gives you suggestions of sites to visit (GPS is a button called "Navigate to Tun Tun ). Select this option and asked me how many miles I travel.
Today I feel a whole macho. Let's say I run about 10 km. See what I propose. Look, I said that if I run 10 km, all I have to do is run all the Avenida Diagonal in Barcelona from beginning to end.
I think I bought the GPS of the Junior Woodchucks , because it tells me that 10 km is the distance to the highest clouds in the atmosphere and that the planes are at 10-12 km altitude. How curious! The pileup that I bought is fine. I will explore some more.
How far will the Barcelona to Lleida? I said that about 150 km, the same as the height to which are the Northern Lights in the sky. Ho, ho. This GPS is the peel!
And from Barcelona to Valencia? About 350 km. As the altitude at which the ISS revolves around the Earth. Barcelona How to Pontevedra? The radius of Pluto. "From Barcelona to Warsaw? The radius of the planet Mercury. "From Barcelona to Athens? The radius of the planet Mars. "From Barcelona to Ottawa? The radius of the planet Venus. From Barcelona to Toronto, the radius of the Earth.
Figure 2.10: Comparison of the rocky planets of the Solar System.
I understand now. I just found a GPS option called "Heaven to Tun Tun" which lets you navigate through the universe ... Says that the radius of Neptune and Uranus is like going to the antipodes of the Earth, the radius of Saturn is like a ride and half the world. And the radius of Jupiter, the largest planet in the Solar System, is a world tour and 3 / 4. (About 70000 km in radius). And the sun's radius is about twice the distance from Earth to the Moon. Wow!
Comparison of Solar System planets and the Sun
Meter "Solar System on a football field? How? Anyway, I'll give OK to see what I get ... Go! It shows the distances of the planets from the Sun as if the Sun were in a goal in a soccer field and the (formerly) most distant planet (Pluto) was on the other end.
orbits of the planets of the Solar System on a football field with the Sun and Pluto, the farthest planet in each goal.
Well, I think that the ball must be in the area of \u200b\u200bthe Sun because almost all the planets are in your area. Surely they are launching a corner. Then the team take care of Pluto and not rely because it only have been in court to defend Uranus and Neptune. As has a counter ...
And the stars? What will? No, I do not mean the stars of the football match, which in this case would only be the Sun, but how are the other stars of the Galaxy to the Sun "The Sun is too big or too small?
Man, that the sun was two times the distance to the Moon has hit me, really. So the little sun should not be. In fact, the smallest known star has a size equal to one-eighth the size of the Sun, ie, only slightly larger than Jupiter.
But it is known star with a radius of about 2000 times larger than the Sun, or 700 billion times larger than a person like me 1.80m.
Do you think we killed the size of the stars? In our galaxy there are 100 billion stars. The galaxies are grouped in clusters of galaxies
Thursday, March 18, 2010
How To Fix Opening Mechanism On Ironing Board
cumulative score PROBLEM OF FIRST AND SECOND
This is the total points earned by participants in the first 2 problems.
http://www.mediafire.com/?wmzekjrdw3g
http://www.mediafire.com/?wmzekjrdw3g
Here, the second problem solving and the scores achieved by participants.
Friday, March 12, 2010
Woodbury Outlet By Train
LINKS TO DOWNLOAD THE SECOND ISSUE OF THE COMPETITION "CREATIVE MIND"
http://www.mediafire.com/?imunjmwtent
http://www.mediafire WORD . com /? wmnzmi1mnyz PDF
http://www.mediafire.com/?imunjmwtent
http://www.mediafire WORD . com /? wmnzmi1mnyz PDF
Calories Wise Breakfast
CONTEST SECOND PROBLEM UNDERSTANDING "CREATIVE MIND"
Agouti, Ñaque
L eer is definitely a smart game and daring. E s puzzle, curious and fun riddle C apaz to touch the most distant, numb and distracted. T ll play reading, travel with the soul, fly with the mind: U us closer to their dreams, others with fun attitude, R Ien in finding that the shell collapses always cold of Lyrics A force nte and passion of sailing. (JAM)
research groups, Signum Open Classroom and academic contexts, held an international congress of intelligence and reading practices in the month of October. The above event will take place in the city of Cartagena and have four rooms for discussions, namely: Agouti, Ñaque, T-shirt and knock.
In the first, coordinated by researchers ARCINIEGAS AGNES, ERNESTO Iglesias and Andres Ortiz, will discuss issues related to reading and thinking in basic school, in the second room (Ñaque), directed by specialists and OCTAVIO Teberosky ANA Hainaut, be presented research findings about the mental process of reading comprehension in school career, for his part, in room T-shirt, marine experts coordinated by ECG and Rafael Ayala, will study the status of cognitive skills involved in the act of reading of University Professors; Finally, the last room, called the Oaks, led by teachers DELIA LERNER, JOHN JAIRO MORENO DELVAL and concentrate its attention on the analysis of the mental mechanisms necessary for critical reading disabled children.
According to previous information, solve the following two points:
1. Say what room should be located in the following public figures who for various reasons have requested invitation to the congress: ALVARO URIBE, Nohemi Sanin, Antanas Mockus, GUSTAVO PETRO and the Attorney General's Office, ALEJANDRO ORDONEZ. Also report in which room must be members of Signum open classroom and academic contexts, ISABEL JARAMILLO, KENYA PENA, CESAR VASQUEZ AND ARIZA Juber.
2. In the following, which anticipates some of the conclusions of the conference, change the name of each table for their meaning.
agoutis, after three days of discussion concluded that due to the routinization and the formal framework of education in Colombia, the present basic school very low development of the relational operations necessary for superior reading. Similarly, the Ñaque determined that older students are serious obstacles evidence to connect the texts with their ideological and political contexts, thereby preventing critical readings more consistent and purposeful. On the other hand, ÑIQUIS alert us about the difficulties intertextual fragility of systems thinking, manifest in an important sector of university professors and, finally, the oaks, we demonstrate that despite the obvious problems for processing information, the school population with cognitive disabilities can access the creative understanding of textual meanings.
OVERVIEW: Level of difficulty (Basic)
is a problem of "artificial concepts." This is an exercise built on cognitive processes, not directly assess reading performance, therefore, requires no prior knowledge (or discipline, or experiential). However, by its syntactic structure is recommended for students of Higher Education. Its objective is to assess and mobilize basic deductive processes. Intertextual inference operations required, direct observation and indirect approach to hypothetical relational sensitivity minimum .
Agouti, Ñaque
L eer is definitely a smart game and daring. E s puzzle, curious and fun riddle C apaz to touch the most distant, numb and distracted. T ll play reading, travel with the soul, fly with the mind: U us closer to their dreams, others with fun attitude, R Ien in finding that the shell collapses always cold of Lyrics A force nte and passion of sailing. (JAM)
research groups, Signum Open Classroom and academic contexts, held an international congress of intelligence and reading practices in the month of October. The above event will take place in the city of Cartagena and have four rooms for discussions, namely: Agouti, Ñaque, T-shirt and knock.
In the first, coordinated by researchers ARCINIEGAS AGNES, ERNESTO Iglesias and Andres Ortiz, will discuss issues related to reading and thinking in basic school, in the second room (Ñaque), directed by specialists and OCTAVIO Teberosky ANA Hainaut, be presented research findings about the mental process of reading comprehension in school career, for his part, in room T-shirt, marine experts coordinated by ECG and Rafael Ayala, will study the status of cognitive skills involved in the act of reading of University Professors; Finally, the last room, called the Oaks, led by teachers DELIA LERNER, JOHN JAIRO MORENO DELVAL and concentrate its attention on the analysis of the mental mechanisms necessary for critical reading disabled children.
According to previous information, solve the following two points:
1. Say what room should be located in the following public figures who for various reasons have requested invitation to the congress: ALVARO URIBE, Nohemi Sanin, Antanas Mockus, GUSTAVO PETRO and the Attorney General's Office, ALEJANDRO ORDONEZ. Also report in which room must be members of Signum open classroom and academic contexts, ISABEL JARAMILLO, KENYA PENA, CESAR VASQUEZ AND ARIZA Juber.
2. In the following, which anticipates some of the conclusions of the conference, change the name of each table for their meaning.
agoutis, after three days of discussion concluded that due to the routinization and the formal framework of education in Colombia, the present basic school very low development of the relational operations necessary for superior reading. Similarly, the Ñaque determined that older students are serious obstacles evidence to connect the texts with their ideological and political contexts, thereby preventing critical readings more consistent and purposeful. On the other hand, ÑIQUIS alert us about the difficulties intertextual fragility of systems thinking, manifest in an important sector of university professors and, finally, the oaks, we demonstrate that despite the obvious problems for processing information, the school population with cognitive disabilities can access the creative understanding of textual meanings.
OVERVIEW: Level of difficulty (Basic)
is a problem of "artificial concepts." This is an exercise built on cognitive processes, not directly assess reading performance, therefore, requires no prior knowledge (or discipline, or experiential). However, by its syntactic structure is recommended for students of Higher Education. Its objective is to assess and mobilize basic deductive processes. Intertextual inference operations required, direct observation and indirect approach to hypothetical relational sensitivity minimum .
Communication Board Following Stroke
10 Behold, you are heavy!
already know to determine the distance to the star, its temperature, composition
, its intrinsic brightness, its size. What are we missing?
But I still I have a question. How should I know the mass of the stars?
mass is what makes the bodies of the universe attract each other. The more mass, the attractiveness is the body in question. Well
. . . Well I guess the biggest stars are the most massive, right? Ale!, Problem solved.
I'm more relaxed. Sure, it makes sense. The largest are the most massive. It must be so. Come, I'm going to relax and take a bath.
I'm in the bathroom little calm. The water is still warm and I have no desire to leave so soon. I'll read a book. Astronomy, of course. Look
coolest photos. This is ... Saturn.
Wow! It says here that Saturn would float in water. I can not help looking at my chichas sunk in the water and think that I must be very fat if I
sink into the water and Saturn, which is 10 times larger than Earth, it floats.
Ah! He says that what happens here is that Saturn is less dense than water and it floats. That is, that the matter in Saturn is not as dense and apilotonada in one volume that my belly is more matter than Saturn and therefore sinks. What a depression! I'm going to eat chocolate.
is, that my argument that the larger more massive an object is false. Is not the same take a cork than the same volume, but lead.
So, If I can not trust their size. . . How will I know the mass of the stars?
Mmmm. . . How good is the chocolate! But you should play sports. Anyway ... I can always go to the moon and weigh less. Everyone remembers
the astronauts bouncing on the moon and falling slowly.
were light as a feather.
Wait a minute. . . Why is that? Why do astronauts, who have the same tummy than on Earth, when the moon will weigh less?
The difference between the Earth and Moon is that it is less massive and therefore less strongly attracted to its surface bodies.
Similarly, if a body is orbiting a star much more massive star has the least take the body to circle around him. Faster orbit. It seems logical, right?
Well, we have the problem solved. We watch a double star,
of those that revolve around each other and look how long it takes to return to
same position. That gives us information on the mass of the binary stars. The shorter the time, but mass.
Once we know the mass of stars in a dual system can
stop and analyze how that mass is a function of the light they emit.
When we do this we see that there is a relationship between the light emitted in a star and its mass.
If we determine the dependence of the luminosity of a star of its mass by double stars, this very relationship can be applied to single stars. That is, now we have a law that says that such a shining star
therefore must have a mass equal to both.
There is also another method that starts to be used also to know the mass of single stars. For this we need to talk about our friend
Einstein and relativity. Relativity tells us that light behaves like a
body mass. So, that could happen if an object has some mass
was able to bring a ray of light (or at least make you tickle
).
This means that if a ray of light passes near a star on his way
to Earth, the ray in question is diverted from its original path
taking another direction. We'll see how far the stars are in a slightly different position in the sky. The more different
this position is the star mass is shifting light. And voila, we have the mass of the star. Click
here to see animation of how the background stars change their position over a star in front of them.
already know to determine the distance to the star, its temperature, composition
, its intrinsic brightness, its size. What are we missing?
But I still I have a question. How should I know the mass of the stars?
mass is what makes the bodies of the universe attract each other. The more mass, the attractiveness is the body in question. Well
. . . Well I guess the biggest stars are the most massive, right? Ale!, Problem solved.
I'm more relaxed. Sure, it makes sense. The largest are the most massive. It must be so. Come, I'm going to relax and take a bath.
I'm in the bathroom little calm. The water is still warm and I have no desire to leave so soon. I'll read a book. Astronomy, of course. Look
coolest photos. This is ... Saturn.
Saturn, the second largest planet in our solar system,
much larger than Earth, it would float in water because of its low density.
Wow! It says here that Saturn would float in water. I can not help looking at my chichas sunk in the water and think that I must be very fat if I
sink into the water and Saturn, which is 10 times larger than Earth, it floats.
Ah! He says that what happens here is that Saturn is less dense than water and it floats. That is, that the matter in Saturn is not as dense and apilotonada in one volume that my belly is more matter than Saturn and therefore sinks. What a depression! I'm going to eat chocolate.
is, that my argument that the larger more massive an object is false. Is not the same take a cork than the same volume, but lead.
So, If I can not trust their size. . . How will I know the mass of the stars?
Mmmm. . . How good is the chocolate! But you should play sports. Anyway ... I can always go to the moon and weigh less. Everyone remembers
the astronauts bouncing on the moon and falling slowly.
were light as a feather.
Wait a minute. . . Why is that? Why do astronauts, who have the same tummy than on Earth, when the moon will weigh less?
The difference between the Earth and Moon is that it is less massive and therefore less strongly attracted to its surface bodies.
Similarly, if a body is orbiting a star much more massive star has the least take the body to circle around him. Faster orbit. It seems logical, right?
Well, we have the problem solved. We watch a double star,
of those that revolve around each other and look how long it takes to return to
same position. That gives us information on the mass of the binary stars. The shorter the time, but mass.
Once we know the mass of stars in a dual system can
stop and analyze how that mass is a function of the light they emit.
When we do this we see that there is a relationship between the light emitted in a star and its mass.
If we determine the dependence of the luminosity of a star of its mass by double stars, this very relationship can be applied to single stars. That is, now we have a law that says that such a shining star
therefore must have a mass equal to both.
There is also another method that starts to be used also to know the mass of single stars. For this we need to talk about our friend
Einstein and relativity. Relativity tells us that light behaves like a
body mass. So, that could happen if an object has some mass
was able to bring a ray of light (or at least make you tickle
).
This means that if a ray of light passes near a star on his way
to Earth, the ray in question is diverted from its original path
taking another direction. We'll see how far the stars are in a slightly different position in the sky. The more different
this position is the star mass is shifting light. And voila, we have the mass of the star. Click
here to see animation of how the background stars change their position over a star in front of them.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Sample Powerpoint Wedding Templates
9. Size matters
When I was little and watched the sky I saw only three or four stars, the brightest. I felt lucky to have stars bright enough to shine above the city sky. So I asked what was special to those stars to shine more than others. It was a question
which found no easy answer. That is, I imagined the stars as lanterns floating in space. I took the flashlight from my house, lit it and went away to see it as a dot. My flashlight did not shine much so far. But when I was going closer and closer to the eye, my pupil is contracted until it was even able to dazzle. That is, the distance should also stars shine less. Does that mean that the stars that shine in the sky are the closest to us? Not necessarily.
In the television sets have a very large outbreaks, much more powerful than my little flashlight. If you placed a these foci at the same distance to my flashlight, it is clear that the focus of much television shine, dazzling even from afar. Then go! Reached a dead end. How would I know if the sky's brightest stars are nearest stars shine brighter or because they emit more light than others.
Wait. . . Maybe when I was a kid I could not know, but now. I know calculate the distance to the stars (see entry 7 this blog). So actually I also know how powerful the star lights. I know what its intrinsic brightness.
So, what think? If we calculate the intrinsic brightness of all stars by correcting the distance factor, what we see? What all the stars shine like and some we see intrinsically brighter only because they are closer? Or really not all stars emit the same amount of light? I do not know that you will have responded but the second option is correct: not all the same issue.
And what might have stars that are brighter than others? Let's see if I know the answer ... Think ... As the stars shine by virtue of being hot (entry 8 see this blog), surely the stars that are brighter are those hotter, right?
Do you remember how you know the temperature of a star ? Well, if we look at how dependent the intrinsic brightness temperature we have the following figure:
In this figure we painted in vertical brightness of the stars, which emit, and the horizontal axis the temperature (with the coolest stars on the right and the hottest on the left).
see that, indeed, the hottest stars emit more than the coldest in general, but not always. There are some cool stars (ie red) to shine much (top right of Figure 2.7). How can it be?
That I was not so difficult to imagine. I just imagined what would happen if many lanterns hung out weaklings like mine and put them all together. If you compare the combined light of all lanterns brighten sure that the focus of television that dazzled me. For example, the TV screen or computer, is composed of many small lights (or LED pixels, depends on TV) that together can even illuminate the dining room of my house when I see a scary movie with the lights off, but that one does not illuminate much of anything.
I'm not saying that those cool stars that shine brighter than the hottest stars are actually many close together. Stars but are simply larger (more surface station) and so bright as the hottest but smaller. So to know the size of a star is enough to see how much light is emitted, and knowing the temperature, and we have your size.
And oddly enough, this method to determine the size of the stars from that glitters is inherently easier than the direct method, ie, watching the star under high magnification and measure its size. The latter method itself that is used to measure the size of planets and nearby stars, distant stars but we need many more increases to distinguish such things off and know their size, which is difficult to achieve.
One last hope left for us to measure the size of those distant stars without the help of its luminosity. And that hope goes through that is part of an eclipsing binary system. A binary system is two stars that revolve around each other. If they are called eclipsing aligned with Earth, so that when one goes against the other, that an eclipse. During these eclipses, the amount of light they receive is lower (or higher depending on whether the star that eclipses are less bright or brighter than the other). Looking at what does the eclipse, ie the time a star takes to move ahead of the other, you can know the size of the stars if you know the distance to the system. Ingenious, no?
When I was little and watched the sky I saw only three or four stars, the brightest. I felt lucky to have stars bright enough to shine above the city sky. So I asked what was special to those stars to shine more than others. It was a question
which found no easy answer. That is, I imagined the stars as lanterns floating in space. I took the flashlight from my house, lit it and went away to see it as a dot. My flashlight did not shine much so far. But when I was going closer and closer to the eye, my pupil is contracted until it was even able to dazzle. That is, the distance should also stars shine less. Does that mean that the stars that shine in the sky are the closest to us? Not necessarily.
In the television sets have a very large outbreaks, much more powerful than my little flashlight. If you placed a these foci at the same distance to my flashlight, it is clear that the focus of much television shine, dazzling even from afar. Then go! Reached a dead end. How would I know if the sky's brightest stars are nearest stars shine brighter or because they emit more light than others.
Wait. . . Maybe when I was a kid I could not know, but now. I know calculate the distance to the stars (see entry 7 this blog). So actually I also know how powerful the star lights. I know what its intrinsic brightness.
So, what think? If we calculate the intrinsic brightness of all stars by correcting the distance factor, what we see? What all the stars shine like and some we see intrinsically brighter only because they are closer? Or really not all stars emit the same amount of light? I do not know that you will have responded but the second option is correct: not all the same issue.
And what might have stars that are brighter than others? Let's see if I know the answer ... Think ... As the stars shine by virtue of being hot (entry 8 see this blog), surely the stars that are brighter are those hotter, right?
Do you remember how you know the temperature of a star ? Well, if we look at how dependent the intrinsic brightness temperature we have the following figure:
Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. This diagram shows that stars some
temperature can not have any intrinsic brightness.
Most are concentrated in a line diagonally across the diagram,
although there stars outside the main sequence.
In this figure we painted in vertical brightness of the stars, which emit, and the horizontal axis the temperature (with the coolest stars on the right and the hottest on the left).
see that, indeed, the hottest stars emit more than the coldest in general, but not always. There are some cool stars (ie red) to shine much (top right of Figure 2.7). How can it be?
That I was not so difficult to imagine. I just imagined what would happen if many lanterns hung out weaklings like mine and put them all together. If you compare the combined light of all lanterns brighten sure that the focus of television that dazzled me. For example, the TV screen or computer, is composed of many small lights (or LED pixels, depends on TV) that together can even illuminate the dining room of my house when I see a scary movie with the lights off, but that one does not illuminate much of anything.
I'm not saying that those cool stars that shine brighter than the hottest stars are actually many close together. Stars but are simply larger (more surface station) and so bright as the hottest but smaller. So to know the size of a star is enough to see how much light is emitted, and knowing the temperature, and we have your size.
And oddly enough, this method to determine the size of the stars from that glitters is inherently easier than the direct method, ie, watching the star under high magnification and measure its size. The latter method itself that is used to measure the size of planets and nearby stars, distant stars but we need many more increases to distinguish such things off and know their size, which is difficult to achieve.
One last hope left for us to measure the size of those distant stars without the help of its luminosity. And that hope goes through that is part of an eclipsing binary system. A binary system is two stars that revolve around each other. If they are called eclipsing aligned with Earth, so that when one goes against the other, that an eclipse. During these eclipses, the amount of light they receive is lower (or higher depending on whether the star that eclipses are less bright or brighter than the other). Looking at what does the eclipse, ie the time a star takes to move ahead of the other, you can know the size of the stars if you know the distance to the system. Ingenious, no?
Measuring so it takes a star to pass in front of another in a dual
we know the size of the stars of the system.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Mixed Wrestling Drawings
Solution, the first problem, competition CRATIVA
Dear friends participating in the competition agency of understanding CREATIVE MIND. Solving the first problem is:
Understanding is a productive activity consists in associating forms, in principle, empty, called significant, with content technically called meanings. Such activity, essentially human, is the fundamental reason that separates us from the Beast. Therefore, much hurt the ego of contemporary Colombian investigative reports that indicate such precarious comprehensive performances of the national school. That fact makes us see poignantly naive, painfully stereotyped in the phylogenetic scale and less dominance and more and more about other animals.
scores are in the link
http://www.mediafire.com/?rignvoztt10
Who sent
solution and not scored, can not the same as those amounted to recall the answer, can continue applying. With 10 issues.
The next will be released on Friday, March 12, 2010. SIGNUM
open classroom
Jairo Anibal Moreno C. Director
Dear friends participating in the competition agency of understanding CREATIVE MIND. Solving the first problem is:
Understanding is a productive activity consists in associating forms, in principle, empty, called significant, with content technically called meanings. Such activity, essentially human, is the fundamental reason that separates us from the Beast. Therefore, much hurt the ego of contemporary Colombian investigative reports that indicate such precarious comprehensive performances of the national school. That fact makes us see poignantly naive, painfully stereotyped in the phylogenetic scale and less dominance and more and more about other animals.
scores are in the link
http://www.mediafire.com/?rignvoztt10
Who sent
solution and not scored, can not the same as those amounted to recall the answer, can continue applying. With 10 issues.
The next will be released on Friday, March 12, 2010. SIGNUM
open classroom
Jairo Anibal Moreno C. Director
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)